Funding Universal Basic Income in the Age of AI and Humanoid Robots

Published on January 07, 2026 by Claudio Cabete

Why automation must help pay for the society it transforms


The problem we are approaching faster than we admit

Artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics are no longer speculative technologies. They are already replacing human labor across software, logistics, manufacturing, customer service, and increasingly, physical-world jobs. The pace of this change matters.

We are heading toward a near future where: - Productivity continues to rise
- Corporate profits increase
- The need for human labor declines

This creates a structural problem: if wages disappear, purchasing power disappears with them. Our economic system still relies on human income as the primary mechanism for distributing value. Automation breaks that mechanism.

The question is no longer whether jobs will be displaced, but how society absorbs the shock without collapse.


Why Universal Basic Income needs funding now, not later

Universal Basic Income (UBI) is often discussed as a future emergency response—something to deploy after mass unemployment arrives. That framing is dangerous.

If UBI is introduced after widespread displacement: - It will feel like charity, not participation
- Political backlash will be severe
- Automation will be framed as the enemy

If UBI funding begins before the shock: - The system adapts gradually
- Companies normalize the cost
- Society builds trust in the transition

UBI should be infrastructure, not disaster relief.


A simple principle: automation must replace lost wages

Historically, labor has been how value flows back into society. When companies replace people with machines, they remove wages from the economy.

That missing income must be replaced—or consumption, stability, and social cohesion fail.

A practical proposal

When a company replaces a human role with AI or a robot:

  • The company continues to increase profits
  • Society receives a portion of the displaced wage

Example: - A $100,000/year human job is replaced by automation
- The company contributes $50,000/year to a UBI fund

This is not a penalty—it is value recapture.

The company still wins: - Lower total costs
- Higher productivity
- No benefits, sick leave, or turnover

Society wins: - Purchasing power remains
- Automation gains are shared
- The transition becomes sustainable


Why this is better than traditional corporate taxes

Traditional corporate taxes: - Are easy to avoid
- Do not scale with automation
- Tax profits after the fact

A labor-replacement tax: - Is tied directly to the cause of disruption
- Scales automatically as automation increases
- Preserves incentives to innovate

If you remove wages from the economy, you must replace purchasing power.


Conclusion

Automation is not the enemy. Delay is.

If we wait until mass displacement arrives, the response will be chaotic and reactive. If we begin funding Universal Basic Income now, using the productivity gains of AI and humanoid robots, the transition can be stable, humane, and economically sound.

The future is being automated.
The benefits should be shared.

Back to Blog